Mike Hudack

Hi. I'm Mike Hudack and this is my Tumblr. I'm a high school dropout, the CEO of blip.tv and a former warblogger. Also check out the blip.tv blog.

josephweisenthal:

Amazing. Black Congressional witness rips Sen. Barbara Boxer for being CLEARLY racialy condescending.

Of course, she’s a Democrat, so he must be wrong, but still!

Really?  I think he’s being a little over sensitive and intentionally combative.

Notes about this post from the Tumblr community:

  1. jasencomstock reblogged this from sds and added:
    She shoulda known better talking to a Chamber dude like that.
  2. sds reblogged this from thatisracist
  3. thatisracist reblogged this from randyhaddock
  4. josephweisenthal reblogged this from iambal and added:
    I know sarcasm doesn’t work that well online, but come on. Give me a little credit.
  5. iambal reblogged this from randyhaddock and added:
    what kills me MOST about this is the original poster’s comment, “Of course, she’s a Democrat, so he must be wrong, but...
  6. brooklynmutt reblogged this from needtherapy
  7. scttkrkwd reblogged this from josephweisenthal and added:
    josephweisenthal i agree that you mostly hear it coming from reublicans. now it could be that it mostly comes from...
  8. josephweisenthal reblogged this from scttkrkwd and added:
    Yes, people from both parties can be condescending towards minorities. It’s ridiculous. It’s also true that you only...
  9. scttkrkwd reblogged this from randyhaddock and added:
    you want to see a repulican do the same thing? watch some of the sotomayor hearings, if you havnt already, and then...
  10. mikehudack reblogged this from josephweisenthal and added:
    You’re right. I don’t know how I missed that the first thirteen times!
  11. thedailyfiona reblogged this from randyhaddock and added:
    members of a race...Jesus *@&#%, this woman is such an asshole. I’m embarrassed to be...
  12. josephweisenthal reblogged this from mattlehrer and added:
    So you’re convinced Mike, now that the time period has been more closely specified?
  13. mattlehrer reblogged this from mikehudack and added:
    2:34 to 2:40: “he would be proud that you are here.” On another note, the official transcript should be posted online...
  14. innonate reblogged this from mikehudack and added:
    “Just so you know, he would be proud that you were here.” 2:36 I have to cringe with Joe here. Sorry, Mike.
  15. mikehudack reblogged this from josephweisenthal and added:
    Still not hearing it.
  16. randyhaddock reblogged this from johncarney and added:
    Watch this. This is what’s wrong with the Democratic Party’s collectivist approach to race. They cannot see that members...
  17. needtherapy reblogged this from mikehudack and added:
    josephweisenthal: mikehudack: josephweisenthal:...I agree with Mike. This guy was...
  18. josephweisenthal reblogged this from mikehudack and added:
    Right at the 2:30+ is the crazy part.
  19. mikehudack reblogged this from josephweisenthal and added:
    What timecode did this happen at? I’d love to re-watch that segment and see if I missed that.
  20. zigziggityzoo reblogged this from mikehudack and added:
    The error was on both sides, but she definitely crossed a line there.
  21. josephweisenthal reblogged this from mikehudack and added:
    Well, yes. But then she said he’d be proud of the witness. And, really, if a white, Republican Senator said that a...
  22. mikehudack reblogged this from josephweisenthal and added:
    I got to the part where she said that the guy she was quoting would be “proud” that he was being quoted. One or the...
  23. josephweisenthal reblogged this from mikehudack and added:
    What? Did you get to the part where she said that the guy she was quoting would be “proud” of the witness for appearing?...
  24. mikehudack reblogged this from josephweisenthal and added:
    Really? I think he’s...little over sensitive and intentionally combative.
  25. johncarney reblogged this from josephweisenthal
  26. josephweisenthal posted this