Mike Hudack

+1 on parker, google is past tense

lessin:

so, from what I have read - I am totally in accord with the concept that google is past tense - as parker seemed to suggest here

same theme, but my reasoning/phrasing - from an old blog-post, is a bit different.

the value of information is based on probability — google can only now support highly probable answers, static search results.  The capital of Colorado used to be a relatively more improbable answer than it is now

— Facebook and Twitter are pipes for the improbable.

I’m not smart enough to understand this. Pipes for the improbable? Please help. How is the capital of Colorado an improbable answer?

reblogged from lessin

1. triciawang liked this
2. thegongshow liked this
3. jollilama liked this
4. gbattle reblogged this from lessin and added:

   gbattle sez: I too have an old blog post about this subject in a more generalized sense here. The value of information...

5. christmasgorilla liked this
6. arig liked this
7. princeservices reblogged this from mikehudack
8. lessin reblogged this from mikehudack and added:

   Yes on the beer… late is good tho? 11pm? Probability is the way to go *I think* - beer will decide.

9. mikehudack reblogged this from lessin and added:

   OK. Makes sense. Why not use the word “accessibility” instead of “probability”? Just to be cute? Let’s grab a beer...

10. lessin reblogged this from mikehudack and added:

    so - basically — the value of information is f(probability)…. if an answer is easy to find / commodity then knowing it...

11. mikehudack reblogged this from lessin and added:

    I’m not smart enough...understand this. Pipes for

12. lessin posted this