William James once argued that every philosophic system sets out to conceal, first of all, the philosopher’s own temperament: that pre-rational bundle of preferences that urges him to hop on whatever logic-train seems to be already heading in his general direction. This creates, as James put it, “a certain insincerity in our philosophic discussions: the potentest of all our premises is never mentioned … What the system pretends to be is a picture of the great universe of God. What it is—and oh so flagrantly!—is the revelation of how intensely odd the personal flavor of some fellow creature is.”
After reading the details of Rand’s early life, I find it hard to think of Objectivism as very objective at all—it looks more like a rational program retrofitted to a lifelong temperament, a fantasy world created to cancel the nightmare of a terrifying childhood. This is the comedy, the tragedy, and the power of Rand: She built a glorious imaginary empire on that nuclear-grade temperament, then devoted every ounce of her will and intelligence to proving it was all pure reason.
I want to buy Sam Anderson a drink and shake his hand. (via syntheticpubes)
Notes about this post from the Tumblr community:
-
generic1 liked this
-
samhuleatt liked this
-
vruz liked this
-
rafer reblogged this from mikehudack and added:
Rafer sez: Her philosophy also moved from pro-rich to anti-poor after the death of her husband. I suspect causation.
-
klaatu reblogged this from soupsoup
-
tobles liked this
-
ronbailey liked this
-
nhaler liked this
-
opalandtheidiot liked this
-
mayjah liked this
-
sendchocolate liked this
-
quedadequatro liked this
-
canadiansugar liked this
-
cleversimon liked this
-
swamibooba liked this
-
rickahh liked this
-
shoesonwrong reblogged this from coyotesqrl
-
shoesonwrong liked this
-
stacyturner reblogged this from syntheticpubes
-
hammerito liked this
-
coyotesqrl reblogged this from hammerito and added:
Ayn Rand was a failed screenwriter. She couldn’t win a fucking argument with the dude who wrote Troll 2.
-
crookedindifference reblogged this from hammerito and added:
FUCK YES. although we seem to have the same opinion so it would benefit to have a counterpoint.
-
spiritguide liked this
-
hammerito reblogged this from soupsoup and added:
Although I disagree with Objectivism as a reasonable way to live, Atlas Shrugged is one of the most important books I’ve...
-
willpwer liked this
-
mopostal reblogged this from soupsoup and added:
I think this SyntheticPubes fellow may be on to something.
-
mopostal liked this
-
manymachines liked this
-
catmansmuckers liked this
-
tylerhwillis liked this
-
ninjapants liked this
-
piscesinpurple liked this
-
jacknagel reblogged this from soupsoup and added:
The majority of her [Rand] philosophy is revolting, but her story is just so incredibly fascinating.
-
abeshafi reblogged this from mikehudack
-
hughbot liked this
-
chuckmore liked this
-
tragos liked this
-
ferrydust liked this
-
soupsoup reblogged this from syntheticpubes and added:
William James once argued that every philosophic system sets out...conceal, first of all,...
-
gbattle liked this
-
feelingsaregross reblogged this from mikehudack
-
hlewisallways liked this
-
mikehudack reblogged this from atencio
-
stryker liked this
-
hunterstephenson liked this
-
atencio reblogged this from syntheticpubes and added:
buy Sam Anderson a drink
-
atencio liked this
-
peckinpah reblogged this from syntheticpubes and added:
Her life story/psychological underpinnings seem about as blatant as her fictional works. I’m hardly surprised.
- Show more notes